I LOVE Chapter 4. I had the same English teacher for 10th
and 11th grade, and she is the reason I want to be a teacher.
Anyway, very few classes of hers were not an environment like the ones
described in the book. I always felt comfortable contributing my ideas in her
class, and I will always remember the very active debates the class got into
about things. I was in the honors English class, and so we had the same kids
together for 4+ years of school (we were together in middle school too). I don’t
think she took this same approach to her “regular” classes. I have always known
that the English class that I loved so much would always be my foundation for
the way I approached my own students in my classroom someday. It didn’t really make sense to me that other
teachers were unaware that students love environments like that.
I really like the way the author of the chapter talks about
what it means to comprehend. It seems like with NCLB, teachers are not able to
devote students for one topic and really nail it before they have to move on to
make sure all the standards are covered. Kids really like when teachers spend
more than one class period on a subject so that the students can really feel
comfortable with the ideas and express their own ideas about them. Again, if
the members of the government really understood what students really want/need,
they could make better decisions that would benefit everyone, and test scores would
probably be better. I know there has to be a better solution out there than
NCLB.
Hmm, I'm wondering how the approach differs for the teacher you mentioned with the "regular" classes? Does this mean that the students in the class created the environment or that it can only be created by or for certain users? I would think "regular" students might especially appreciate a welcoming environment..
ReplyDelete